[We'd like to thank Paul Jakus for this analysis of recent Phish.net ratings. Coincidentally, we've been analyzing ratings with him for a future blog series digging deeper into how Phish fans rate shows. Stay tuned for more on ratings soon! —Ed.]
At 3:42 p.m. on the afternoon of January 3, 2024 the ratings function of Phish.Net was disabled due to unusual patterns in ratings behavior. Here we’ll explain those patterns, but first let’s establish what a “normal” Holiday Run ratings pattern looks like.
For comparison, let’s look at ratings submitted between 1:00 a.m. January 1, 2023 through 3:42 p.m. January 3, 2023 (a time period that will match that of the 2023/24 NYE Run.) Some 1,004 ratings were submitted over nearly 63 hours, for 116 different shows. Of these ratings, 838 (84%) were for the four holiday shows, leaving 166 ratings to be spread across the remaining 112 non-holiday shows. The most new ratings any non-holiday show received was six.
So, what happened after the 2023/24 Run? Read on for more.
The first rating for 12/31/23 was at 1:12 a.m. on January 1, 2024. A total of 3,779 ratings were submitted for 442 different shows until ratings were suspended at 3:42 p.m. on January 3. Only 2,103 of these ratings (56%) were for the 2023/2024 NYE Run, leaving 1,676 ratings spread over the remaining 438 shows.
There is no doubt that something odd happened.
Now let’s take a closer look at the ratings for the Gamehendge show (Figure 1). Nearly 1,800 ratings were posted, with a very high proportion of ‘5’ ratings (87%), neither of which would be unexpected for an instantly classic performance. Almost 7% of ratings were a ‘1’, though, which was a bit higher than the norm for all modern era shows (5.8%). Peculiar, yes, but nothing immediately identified as highly unusual.
But if nothing was obviously wrong with ratings for the Gamehendge show, why suspend the ratings function?
Recall the same time period after the 2022/23 run: we saw lots of ratings for the Holiday shows and relatively little activity on non-holiday shows. Things were different this year.
In 2024, newly submitted ratings of notably historic shows were pervasive, with more than 30 older shows receiving at least 10 new ratings in the first three days of the New Year. For example, here are all the older shows with 30 or more new ratings (and the ratings distribution) during the January 1-3, 2024 period.
Table 1: Older Shows and Newly Submitted Ratings
Before January 1, 2024*
After January 1, 2024*
Date
Location
# of Ratings
Average
# of New Ratings
Average of New Ratings
12/31/1999
Big Cypress, FL
1,325
4.767
259
4.232
12/30/1997
MSG
770
4.700
69
3.783
11/22/1997
Hampton, VA
854
4.678
55
3.873
4/3/1998
Nassau, NY
832
4.669
49
3.932
8/2/2003
Limestone IT
490
4.680
39
3.769
12/31/1995
MSG
942
4.634
37
4.297
8/17/1997
Limestone Went
650
4.652
33
4.030
8/22/2015
Watkins Glen Magnaball
1,648
4.649
30
3.233
*Before/After 1:12 a.m. EST, through 3:42 p.m. January 3
It’s clear that Big Cypress was the primary historic show affected, but it was definitely not the only one. Every show in the table above was well-known, highly rated, and listed in The Phish Companion as a “Top 100” performance.
Did all of these performances really get perceived as “worse” starting on January 1?
Let’s take a closer look at ratings for Big Cypress, 12/31/1999. The 259 post-January 1, 2024 ratings happened within about 51 hours. For comparison, the previous 259 ratings for this show were submitted over 1,336 days. The number of new ratings for this show was highly unusual.
Table 2 depicts the number and percentage of each rating for NYE Big Cypress, before and after January 1.
Table 2: Big Cypress (12/31/1999), Before and After January 1, 2024
Rating
Before January 1, 2024*
After January 1, 2024*
1
51 (3.85%)
42 (16.22%)
2
7 (0.53%)
3 (1.16%)
3
14 (1.06%)
4 (1.54%)
4
56 (4.23%)
14 (5.41%)
5
1,197 (90.34%)
196 (75.34%)
*Before/After 1:12 a.m. EST
First, the 12/31/99 ratings distribution looks remarkably similar to that of the 2023 NYE Gamehendge show, except for fewer “1s’. Second, the ratings distribution for the post-January 1 period is markedly different. Is it reasonable to expect 259 ratings to pour in for a show that’s 24 years old, in a matter of hours, and with such different ratings?
A nice feature of the Phish.Net ratings function is that it generates debate among fans, but its primary purpose is to help guide fans, both new and old, through a large body of recorded music. Given this primary goal, and given what appears to be manipulation of numerous highly-regarded shows, it was decided to suspend the ratings function.
The ratings function will return, but Phish.Net administrators are currently mulling possible changes in how ratings are calculated and presented in the future. To begin with, though, it’s necessary to answer the thousand dollar question: whether the ratings submitted this week reflect an honest re-appraisal of historic shows, or if they were submissions designed to affect show rankings.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.